Proskauer Rose International Practice Guide Proskauer Rose LLP | Proskauer.com
      Proskauer on International Litigation and Arbitration:
       Managing, Resolving, and Avoiding Cross-Border Business or Regulatory Disputes
  TRENDS  |  NEWS & EVENTS  |  CONTACT  |  AUTHORS
Text Size:  A  A  A
Print Print
  1. Anti-Suit Injunction Defined: For ease of reference, we define an anti-suit injunction as an order from one court directing a party not to seek relief in another court or not to comply with orders of another court.
  2. Non-U.S. Anti-Suit Injunction Should Be Considered: While courts are generally loath to issue injunctions preventing parties from litigating in other countries, when a party is litigating a matter in the U.S. and the matter might be of interest to a foreign nation, that party should consider whether the non-U.S. court might issue an anti-suit injunction.
  3. Securing an Anti-Suit Injunction May Be Advantageous: For example, a party may conclude that it would benefit from having a non-U.S. court enjoin its adversary’s participation in a U.S. suit.
  4. Evaluation Must Be Based on Governing Non-U.S. Law: The assessment of whether an anti-suit injunction may be issued by the non-U.S. country cannot be made without a thorough understanding of the applicable non-U.S. law. Principles of comity underlie many of the decisions being issued around the world.  Ultimately, however, decisions abroad to issue an anti-suit injunction necessarily will turn on the procedural and substantive laws of the foreign nation.

< Previous Section | Next Section >